SCORING METHODOLOGY · HOW WE SCORE

Every check is benchmarked to public standards.

12 dimensions, each benchmarked to public standards. The surface-level signals can be partly checked with public tools like Google, W3C and SSL Labs — but the judgment of whether AI actually cites you comes from GeoWeb's own weighting model.

THE PUBLIC BASIS

W3C · IETF · WHATWG · Google · Microsoft · schema.org · OWASP · SSL Labs…

From recognized standards bodies & vendors

The surface-level signals in every dimension are benchmarked against these bodies' public specs and tools.

HOW GEOWEB INTEGRATES

1

actionable report

One pass over all 12 dimensions, distilled into a single GEO score and a fix-priority order — plus the AI-citation assessment public tools don't cover.

12 DIMENSIONS × PUBLIC STANDARDS

Every item, laid open

Items marked "Partly verifiable" — public tools check the surface signals; GeoWeb's score layers weighting and deeper judgment on top. Items marked "GeoWeb proprietary" have no single public-tool equivalent.

DimensionWhat we checkBenchmarked public tool / standardType
SESEO technicalTitle, meta, canonical, OG, viewport, lang, image alt, link structureW3C HTML Checker · Rich Results TestPartly verifiable
SDStructured dataJSON-LD / Microdata / RDFa completeness (Organization, FAQ, Product, Article…)Rich Results Test · Schema Markup ValidatorPartly verifiable
CTContent citability40–60-word answer blocks, definition sentences, structured lists/tables, statistic & source citation patterns— No single public toolGeoWeb proprietary
EAE-E-A-T authorityAuthor info, publish/update dates, trust pages, social proof, credential signalsTrustpilotPartly verifiable
SMSemantic structureH1 uniqueness, H1–H6 hierarchy, semantic HTML5 elements, content/HTML ratioW3C Validator · axe DevToolsPartly verifiable
FQFAQ / Q&A readinessFAQPage schema, visible Q&A content, answer quality (20–100 words)Rich Results TestPartly verifiable
SZPerformance & crawl budgetHTML < 2MB, load performance, resource load priorityPageSpeed InsightsPartly verifiable
ACAI crawler accessibilityrobots.txt openness to GPTBot / ClaudeBot / PerplexityBot etc., sitemap, IndexNowGoogle Search Console · Bing Webmaster ToolsPartly verifiable
AEAEO readinessAnswer-first paragraph structure, featured-snippet eligibility, step content, comparison tables— No single public toolGeoWeb proprietary
SCSnippet controlmeta robots, nosnippet, max-snippet, data-nosnippetGoogle Search ConsolePartly verifiable
TSTransport securityHTTPS, HSTS, CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-OptionsSSL Labs · SecurityHeaders.comPartly verifiable
LNLanguage naturalnessBoilerplate density, syntactic variety, specificity, domain-term ratio, human vs LLM patterns— Proprietary judgment modelGeoWeb proprietary

AUXILIARY DIMENSION · NOT IN THE SCORE

Agent friendliness

This measures how open your site is to AI agents (not search crawlers). It does not affect the 12-dimension GEO score above, but it reflects how discoverable, readable and connectable you are to autonomous agents on the agentic web.

What we check

llms.txt, .well-known/* (ai-plugin / MCP server-card / agent-skills), AI-bot robots, Content-Signal, IndexNow

Benchmarked tool / standard

isitagentready.com

Type

Partly verifiable

Not just a score — we tell you what to fix first

Benchmarking public standards is the baseline; distilling 12 dimensions into one priority-ordered fix path, then adding the proprietary AI-citation layer — that's what GeoWeb does.

Run a free full audit →

ON SCORING

GeoWeb benchmarks the public standards and tools above, but applies its own dimension-weighting model and continuously references the latest technical specs and documentation from each engine. So when a single item doesn't match a given third-party tool exactly, that reflects a difference in scoring perspective and weighting — we judge from the angle of "will AI actually cite you", rather than a mechanical match against any one metric.